Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Boehner Pressures Senate to Pass Budget or Have Pay Withheld

WASHINGTON - Despite President Obama's call for Congress to prioritize issues like immigration reform and address climate change during his inaugural address Monday, House Speaker John Boehner said that the House of Representatives will instead continue its focus on fiscal responsibility, including a plan to balance the budget over the next decade.

"There are a lot of priorities for the Congress [and] a lot of priorities for the president, but right now the biggest issue is the debt that's crushing the future for our kids and our grandkids," Boehner, R-Ohio, said. "Taxpayers understand that you can't keep spending money that you don't have, so we're going to continue to focus, especially here over this next 90-, 120-day period, on bringing some fiscal responsibility to Washington."

Boehner, who conducted his first news conference since Dec. 21 this evening, said the House will move forward on its No Budget No Pay act, which directs both chambers of Congress to adopt a budget resolution for FY 2014 by April 15, 2013. If either body fails to pass a budget, members of that body would have their paychecks put into an escrow account starting on April 16 until that body adopts a budget. But, because of the 27 th Amendment, any pay that is withheld would eventually be released at the end of the current Congress, even if a budget doesn't ever pass.

"Over the last four years, House Republicans have offered plans, our budget plans. We've done our budgets but it's been nearly four years since the Senate has done a budget," he said. "Most Americans believe you don't do your job you shouldn't get paid. That's the basis for No Budget, No Pay. It's time for the Senate to act."

The bill, H.R. 325, also temporarily suspends the statutory debt limit until May 18, granting the Treasury Department the additional borrowing authority to meet obligations that require payment over the next three months.

Facing trillion dollar annual budget deficits, Boehner told the House Republican Conference this afternoon that the GOP will advance a budget that becomes balanced over the next 10 years.

"It's time for us to come to a plan that will in fact balance the budget over the next 10 years," he added. "It's our commitment to the American people and we hope the Senate will do their budget as they should have done over the last four years."

Still, the country's growing $16 trillion federal deficit would not balance by then, and Boehner stressed that Republicans are not open to new tax revenue as part of a comprehensive plan to reduce the deficit.

"We are not going to raise taxes on the American people," Boehner insisted. "Nobody on our side is interested in raising taxes on the American people. It's time to deal with the serious problem that we have, which is spending."

That is sure to be a point of contention among Democrats. House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer rejected the GOP's doggedness that new revenue would not be part of a package to reduce the deficit.

"We absolutely reject that. The president absolutely rejects it, I reject it, period," Hoyer, D-Md., said during a pen and pad briefing with reporters Tuesday. "Going forward, revenues are going to still need to be part of the solution, as are cuts and restraints and reduction of growth. All are going to have to be part of it."

The House is expected to vote Wednesday on a three-month increase to the debt limit, a move intended to sync up the next slate of fiscal deadlines facing Congress and provide lawmakers with more time to work out a so-called "Big Deal" on deficit reduction.

As he left the news conference, Boehner ignored a question about whether he believes the measure will pass. Still, the president has promised not to veto it and many congressional Democrats appear open to supporting it.

"This bill is a game bill. It's not a substantive response to a serious problem," Hoyer said. "Having said that, I've made it very clear that defaulting is not an option. All the Republicans leaders believe it's not an option. And so I think, in that context, I'll have to look at it."

Also Read

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/boehner-pressures-senate-pass-budget-pay-withheld-012551916--abc-news-politics.html

branson mo monkees songs rail gun harrisburg top chef texas great pacific garbage patch ben affleck and jennifer garner

Lutherans bristle at suggestion of joining Catholic Church

PARIS (Reuters) - Two leading Lutheran clerics have rejected suggestions from the Vatican that it could create a subdivision for converted Lutherans similar to its structures for Anglicans who join the Roman Catholic Church.

The dispute, concerning tiny numbers of believers but major issues in ecumenical relations, comes as the churches mark the annual Week of Prayer for Christian Unity this week.

Rev Martin Junge, the Chilean-born secretary general of the World Lutheran Federation (WLF), said in a statement that the suggestion caused great concern and would "send wrong signals to LWF member churches around the world."

Bishop Friedrich Weber, the German Lutheran liaison with the Catholic Church, said the idea was unthinkable and amounted to "an unecumenical incitement to switch sides."

The Vatican announced special structures for disaffected Anglicans in 2009, creating a so-called ordinariate so conservatives opposed to female and homosexual bishops could become Catholic while retaining some of their traditions.

Several thousand Anglicans, including dozens of priests and a few bishops, have joined ordinariates established in England, Australia and Canada. Married clergy are exempted from the obligatory celibacy of the Catholic priesthood.

Relations among Christian churches have improved greatly since the 1962-1965 Second Vatican Council and most now see each other more as partners than as competitors. A Catholic bishop attended an ecumenical service Weber celebrated last Sunday.

But this Vatican welcome has raised suspicions among some Protestants that the huge Catholic Church, which makes up half the world's 2.2 billion Christians, now wants to woo away believers from smaller churches torn by internal debate.

IRRITATIONS OVER THE REFORMATION

While the Vatican's opening to Anglicans followed years of bitter public splits in that church, very few of the world's 75 million Lutherans seem interested in reunification with Rome.

Cardinal Kurt Koch, head of the Pontifical Council for Christian Unity, said last October the Vatican would consider creating an ordinariate if Lutherans asked for one.

Archbishop Gerhard Mueller, head of the Vatican's powerful doctrinal office, was reported in Catholic media last week as saying Rome might envisage a special section for Lutherans.

Junge said very few Lutherans wanted to switch to the Catholic Church and creating a special subgroup for them would complicate ties between the churches and confuse Lutherans who wanted to work in harmony with Catholics.

"Creation of such a special structure would have deep ecumenical repercussions," he said, mentioning the issue of how Christianity should be organized. Catholicism is united under the pope while Protestant churches are decentralized.

Weber told the German Protestant news agency Idea that Lutherans desiring full communion with Rome should simply join the Catholic Church rather than seek a special status in it.

He said subjugation to papal authority was alien to the Lutheran view of religious freedom, which Martin Luther set out after he challenged the corrupt papacy in 1517 with the 95 Theses that led to the Protestant Reformation.

Catholic-Lutheran relations have improved to the point that in 1999 they declared the theological dispute over justification - the way that believers can get to Heaven - that led to the Reformation had been resolved.

But Lutheran plans to celebrate the 500th anniversary of the Reformation in 2017 have irritated German Catholic leaders who find the plan to call it a jubilee too triumphalist.

Initial work on a joint statement about the Reformation for the anniversary has highlighted how deeply the Lutherans see their split from Rome as a positive act and the Catholics view the division of western Christianity as a defeat.

(Reporting By Tom Heneghan; Editing by Jon Boyle)

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/lutherans-bristle-suggestion-joining-catholic-church-131448991.html

love actually strikeforce davy jones deep impact miesha tate vs ronda rousey idiocracy usssa baseball

Graham Spanier Seen Courtside At Penn State-Nebraska Game

STATE COLLEGE, Pa. -- Ex-Penn State President Graham Spanier sat courtside at the school's men's basketball game against Nebraska on Saturday, making a rare high-profile appearance as he awaits trial on charges he hushed up child sex abuse allegations against former assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky.

Spanier told The Patriot-News at halftime that he was "invited" to attend the game but wouldn't say by whom. He then said he "wasn't giving interviews." Nebraska narrowly edged out Penn State for the win, 68-64.

Spanier had been Penn State's president for 16 years when he was forced out after Sandusky's November 2011 arrest. He remains a faculty member but was placed on paid leave. He also served as chancellor at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln from 1991 to 1995.

Sandusky, who spent decades on the Penn State staff and was defensive coordinator during two national championship seasons, was convicted in June of sexually abusing 10 boys over 15 years. He is serving a 30- to 60-year sentence and maintains his innocence.

Spanier was charged last November with perjury, obstruction, endangering the welfare of children, failure to properly report suspected child abuse and conspiracy. Former Athletic Director Tim Curley and former Vice President Gary Schultz face the same charges.

The three are awaiting a preliminary hearing and have denied the accusations.

The abuse scandal rocked Penn State, bringing down Hall of Fame football coach Joe Paterno and leading the NCAA, college sports' governing body, to levy unprecedented sanctions against the university's football program.

A university-sanctioned investigation by former FBI director Louis Freeh accused Spanier and Paterno of participating in a cover-up to protect the school's image.

Paterno died almost a year ago. His family has firmly denied the allegations of a cover-up.

"; var coords = [-5, -72]; // display fb-bubble FloatingPrompt.embed(this, html, undefined, 'top', {fp_intersects:1, timeout_remove:2000,ignore_arrow: true, width:236, add_xy:coords, class_name: 'clear-overlay'}); });

Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/20/graham-spanier-courtside_n_2517589.html

prince johan friso windows 8 logo anguilla gone with the wind michael jordan checkers imbibe

Monday, January 21, 2013

How to grow prospects into clients - Steve Gordon Marketing Systems

Last week I got a newsletter in the mail from colleague Jason Leister (you?ll hear more from him in a special interview on Wednesday?stay tuned).

One of the articles talked about the idea of ?growing clients.?
Something I?ve been thinking about for several months?

We underestimate the importance of the growing process for our clients?we expect that we?ll just show up and ?harvest? them.

Doesn?t work like that (and you know it).

And my last three new clients are poster children for the need to ?grow.?

One has been on my email list for almost three years. A year ago he bought a low-priced training course from me. Now he?s ready for 1-on-1 help.

The second, I?ve known in the business community for close to two years?said he?d been ?thinking about it for a while? and was now ready.

The third, I?ve met with a number of times over the last few years, he?s flirted with getting my help, but never committed until now.

They?ve all been ?with me? for YEARS. They all knew they had a problem or challenge that I might be able to help with?but they just weren?t ready yet.

And that?s OK.

I take the long view with my prospects (and you should too).

By the time each one approached me about working together, I had no competition. I worked for years to slowly build trust with them?one email or webinar or newsletter at a time.

I was patient and persistent.

And you know in your heart and in your head that patience and persistence pays off.

But you?re not doing it.

You don?t have a system to do it. (Hey, without a system I?d have never worked with these three clients.)

But you can get a system?a system like mine (and like the one these three clients will have soon).

All you have to do is take the first step here?

?

marketing consultant steve gordon

Your Business Could Double This Year, IF You Fix These 7 Marketing Mistakes

Enter your name and email to get a free copy of my E-Book 7 Deadly Marketing Sins That Will Kill Your Business?

Source: http://stevegordonmarketing.com/the-art-of-growing-clients/

staff sgt. robert bales jason russell norfolk state st patrick s day parade duke invisible children garbage pail kids

THE CLUB

A Masquerade Of Lies

Look inside. [[NEED MALE ROLES, FEMALE ROLES AVAILABLE!]]

Owner:

Game Masters:

This topic is an Out Of Character part of the roleplay, ?A Masquerade Of Lies?. Anything posted here will also show up there.

Topic Tags:

Forum for completely Out of Character (OOC) discussion, based around whatever is happening In Character (IC). Discuss plans, storylines, and events; Recruit for your roleplaying game, or find a GM for your playergroup.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION AND PHOTOS OF THE CLUB PLEASE READ ALL!

"True courage is about knowing not when to take a life, but when to spare one."
-Gandalf, The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey

User avatar
kissmekillme
Member for 0 years



~Things you need to know about the club itself~

Once inside the club
Once you step foot inside the extravagant manor at which the meeting are held in you cannot leave the grounds until the block is lifted. The block is put in place by the president of the club to keep anyone with special gifts or talents on the inside and anyone who is not special on the outside. There is literally no way to escape until the block is lifted.

Activities
A lot of activities done within the club are very old fashioned, dating back to the 1700s when the club was established. Everything from the way the write to the way they dance is derived from the 1700s. The attire of the club consists of beautiful Victorian ball gowns and old fashioned tuxes. At the start of the club meetings there is a council held for all members, it?s boring but it has to be done, after everyone is free to practice their powers on innocent sacrifices, normal people who have been caught for this purpose they will never be set free. The second half of the night is the ball where everyone can mingle, though masks cannot be taken off, nor your real identity reviled, this is mostly for the younger crowd.

By blood we are bound
By blood we are bound is the oath that everyone must give. Their blood is taken from them and kept secret, a curse is placed over the blood, if you betray the club, your blood is destroyed and you die slowly and painfully. It does not matter if you are the president?s son, for betraying you will die. The club is cold and one mess up could cost your life.

Info
All members live in the real world, got to real jobs. As far as high school all members who attend high school go to the same school, though they are unaware of the other. I?m sure their smart enough that they may have a feeling or another person may look familiar, but they would never question in fear of giving secrets away.

Why Masks?
Not only does the club want each guest to have privacy, but they feel as though it is a good way for their young members to fall in love without looks and more based on personality.

Secrets
Any secret society is bound to have a few dark secrets. But, this clubs secrets are beyond infidelity or embezzlement. Let me enlighten you, for starters, in 1725 when the club was first founded the son of the first president murdered his father and his mother for full power of the club, his power was the only one of its kind immortality and invincibility, his brother on the other had had the only power that could kill his power hungry brother and he did so. Now ?The Masquerade? belonged to the youngest of the president?s sons. Years pasted and the more the club grew the dark and more horrifying the secrets become. Thus, going to extreme measures to keep the club and it?s secrets hidden.

User avatar
kissmekillme
Member for 0 years



Post a reply

RolePlayGateway is a site built by a couple roleplayers who wanted to give a little something back to the roleplay community. The site has no intention of earning any profit, and is paid for out of their own pockets.

If you appreciate what they do, feel free to donate your spare change to help feed them on the weekends. After selecting the amount you want to donate from the menu, you can continue by clicking on PayPal logo.

Who is online

Registered users: 0neTailedf0x, Ageha, Alexa [Bot], alexkirby12, Alise120, amelia-anne*, Amnesty*, Anastasia's Arrow, aquamarina2*, Arcayne, Arceius*, Arch_Demon666*, Armageddon, Armourning*, Aryutsuki, Asher MstrImmortalis, AsuraDeWinters*, Augusta*, AuroraDawn*, Avelyne*, AvidSmoker*, bambi_xrave, bandgeek*, Blackbird26*, BlueWind_22, Bosch*, boultinator93, BraceBlaze, Bromander Shepard, BumbleDrop*, Capra, ChaoticMarin*, CharlotteV*, ChristyLovesYou*, cirrus_sd*, Cloasse*, Colonel_Masters*, Comrade*, CriminalMinds*, Crooked Thoughts, Curtsive*, CuteAsKaylah, Dante Angelico, DarkOne, DemiKara, DemonicHaze*, Diarmuid O'Dyna, Digital_Muse*, Dmitrij Rosha, DocBlargle*, DreamerOnTheStars, Drygionas*, DuBois_Scarlett*, Dude, Echo_Rose, Eddy V. Sovorov, Elrith Eldwind*, emotionless, Essence, EverFidelis*, Exabot [Bot], Ezarael*, Fabricator*, fading-into-eternity*, FairestInVerona, fate0013*, Firewind, Floorgan*, Forensic_Anthro, Fox in a Lab Coat, Fredalice*, FyreT1ger*, Game Master Zero*, Gamer_Templar*, Geekly, Genesis Rhapsodos, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, GotDraggedIntoThis*, HadoukenLSD*, Howlkin Stranger*, Hydrall, Iandak, Iezobel, Imagine That!, Imehal, Insomniatic, Ion, jackrules158*, James Seth Lynch*, JGamer502*, Kai, Kapento, Karu*, kissmekillme, Kohananinja*, kr9q*, Kugorie, Kura Ravengade*, Kuroe, Kurokiku*, Lady Inali, LavenderMistress*, Leon Redfield, Leon21, Leonn*, Liberator600*, Lifecharacter*, Liliepanda*, lilyboo12, Linnea, listentothetimpani*, LittleMissGeorgia, LuckyNumber24, Maitros*, Malfunction*, MaliceInWonderland, MaskedCity*, Mat_z6, Merchant, Merusagon*, Messages*, MgeoftheWhtBst*, Miss_Dreamer, Modesty, MoonlightWraith, Morgan, Mr. Crow*, Mrs. Sara Banner, MSNbot Media, MusaMe, Nannyhap, NasiaWords*, Nemmy826, Nevan*, Nevermore90*, nightwolf*, Nikolai*, noonshine, NorthernSoul, obeymycapella*, Oborosen*, Octopus's_Garden, OFortune, Once-Ler_Fangirl*, OverTheRainbow*, Pelly*, Penfold*, pepperx3*, Planet Killer, Polarisbear12*, PsychicBastard, Psychroma, Purpl3_Flam3s, qbsuperstar03*, RacoonMoon()*, radioinvader*, Redred33mer*, Rein_13*, Rem?us*, remy6archer*, roleplay-wizard*, Ruzuki Nakamora*, S1mon*, Saarai*, SaintAndSinner, SakuraXx*, Sammael, sammy132, Sapphire Tears*, SarcasticIrony*, Sathandra*, Saviarre*, Saxious*, Script*, SeraphimLullaby*, Sergeant*, Shaodow*, shmband*, Shpleem*, Shugo Seikatsu*, Sibrand*, SilverStar89, SkullsandSlippers, snowwinter486*, Sonohra*, Sovereign, spayce, Spica, SRincarnate*, Stark Contrast, Starlight77*, Stella11*, Stormageddon, SugarPlum2*, SuperQ19, supertoastgirl, SylphofSpace, Tainted Twinkee*, Tank Emperor*, Tearen Wover, TemplarWarden*, Tessla, thebagel264*, TheGoddessReborn, ThrillerNight*, Thundergod1020*, Tiko*, tornadofan2, True Grave, Tsukiakari, Ulfunn*, Uncertainly*, usernamesareadrag*, varxint*, Vejisama*, Verum Umbra*, vilevixen, VindicatedPurpose, VitaminHeart*, Vizcious, WalkingImmortal, WaltJRimmer, Whispers..x, whymymothergoose, WhySoSerious?*, Wild1, Wing06Twilight*, wolfoftheage*, Wudgeous*, Xiiver*, Xistinna*, xSilentButterflyx, Yahoo [Bot], YellowGrand*, YoureStillAnInnocent*, Yveine, Zentose*, Zitacamron95, ZoeyAutopsyx

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RolePlayGateway/~3/1J1ov2cMZNY/viewtopic.php

birmingham news lee evans lee evans 49ers vs giants giants vs 49ers sf 49ers joe paterno died

A Guy's Take: Men Who Are ?Commitment-phobes?

I?ve had a few discussions with women about ?commitment-phobic men? recently.? That is, men who have a ?fear of commitment? when it comes to relationships.

The typical scenario where a woman will label a guy a ?commitment phobe? is when he?s been seeing a girl for a while ? they spend the majority of their time together, they eat together, they sleep together and so forth?.but he won?t commit in an official sense. That?s usually when they?ll come to me looking for answers.

Well, let?s get into this?

First, I can tell you right off the bat that he?s not a ?commitment-phobe.?? That term was invented by some psychologist to diagnose .0001% of the population for a very specific, extreme condition. ?However, as with nearly every psychological diagnosis, it gets slapped on?everyone the moment it becomes popular?

I?m ADD. ?I?m OCD. ?I?m biploar, and on and on and on. ?Enough with the amateur psychological diagnoses. ?Let?s look at what?s actually going on here.

Most likely scenario: ?The placeholder relationship.

This is an instance where I have to be blunt. ?It?s not that he?s afraid to commit to the girl? it?s that he?s (and I cringe to type these words) not that into her? but into her enough to have her companionship, emotional support, and sex.

When it comes to all things sex and companionship, a guy will say, ?Sure, if you?re offering??

Problem is, guys typically have a terrible gauge on whether or not they?ll catch feelings for the girl. ?For most guys, he won?t catch feelings for the girl as long as he never looks to her for emotional support.

Once a guy starts leaning on a girl emotionally, he starts becoming attached to her on an emotional level. ?Now the girl who he only intended to keep around to keep from being lonely becomes this pseudo-girlfriend.

On the one hand, he cares for her and wants her around. ?After all, he feels better when she?s there versus when she?s not.

On the other hand, he feels that he can do better? and he intends to. ?The rationale he makes in his head is that once he ?gets himself together? (that is, he starts actually?doing the things in his life that he intends to do), he?ll break things off with his not-girlfriend all good and tidy and go for the girl he actually wants to be with.

The only problem is? most people go their whole lives?intending to do what they?ve always wanted to do, but they never get around to it.

Instead, in these instances, men fall deeper into their ?not-girlfriend? relationship.

The girl supports him emotionally and faithfully acts as his crutch so that he can find his strength and become the man he?s always wanted to be. ?She aims to bring him comfort and relief from his painful and tragic life.

What ends up happening is he becomes dependent on her to be his emotional crutch. ?Instead of getting stronger, he gets weaker and more attached to this girl.

So months or years go by and the girl just figures (even after all this time) that if she just loves him enough, he?ll be strong enough to love her back. ?At this point, she?s in deep too ? she?s invested so much into a relationship that she hopes will someday happen, but has yet to ever make its debut into reality.

So now we?re at this point: ?Girl has poured months or?years?of love and obsession into this guy, hoping he?ll one day come around. Guy has become emotionally dependent on the girl for her love and support, but he knows in his heart that the situation isn?t what he actually wants.

And here?s where it gets really perverse: ?On some level, both parties know that if the guy gets into a place of true emotional strength and independence, he?ll leave the girl. ?It?s subconscious in most cases, but I?ve seen it play out enough times that it?s prevalent in these situations.

What ends up happening is that the guy will make sure the girl has?just enough?hope to keep chasing him. ?The girl will make sure that he?s as emotionally dependent on him as she can get him to be.

In these arrangements, you?ll notice that when one side starts to stray, the other side will undermine them.

If the guy starts getting himself together, the girl will find some way to subtly undermine his progress ? usually through comfort, but sometimes through less pleasant means.

If the girl starts to give up on him, he?ll find some way to subtly give her hope for some kind of future. ?After all, he doesn?t want to lose his emotional crutch/sexual outlet security blanket ? then he?d be not only emotionally weakened, but also alone.

Said simply, both sides will do things to entrench the other side exactly where they?re at.

So how does it all end?

Typically?. heartbreak. ?What usually ends up happening is that sooner or later, the ?better thing? the guy was waiting for appears and the moment it does, he disappears.

If you?re the guy, this isn?t such a bad situation since he was able to enjoy a cozy comfortable pseudo-relationship in between.

Moreover, he can always say, ?Well, we were never in an official relationship. ?What did you think was going to happen??

Which brings me to my point?

I don?t know what happened to this culture? I don?t know if it was Hollywood movies, music, TV, an ever-increasing sense of entitlement, a decline in social perceptiveness across the populous? but let?s nail this down.

If you?re seeing a guy for a few weeks, everything is up in the air ? just relax and let things run their course without being worried.But if you?ve spent the majority of your free time with a guy for the last couple of months ? you eat together, sleep together and support each other emotionally ? and he?s making no effort to lock you down? then you?re in a ?placeholder relationship.?

To be honest, there?s nothing wrong with that IF both sides are on the same page. ?Unfortunately, I have yet to see an instance where both sides are on the same side.

Which brings me back to things I?ve said again and again?

You?re single until he specifically locks you down and says you?re in an exclusive relationship together.? Until then, you?re single and shutting down your options or effectively removing yourself from the dating pool will hurt your chances of getting into a relationship, not help them?

People who have great relationships didn?t bet on a losing horse and magically turn him into a winning horse. ?A winning relationship is a great relationship from the start. ? In almost all cases where I get questions, it?s because the woman?knows the answer to her question, but she doesn?t want to believe it. ?She wants to believe that her fantasy will come true in a hopeless scenario. ?My advice: stop betting on losing horses. ?Romantic turnarounds were invented by Hollywood precisely?because they?re an impossible fantasy. ?Stop with it already.

Don?t make your relationship the source of happiness that you then, in turn, bring into your life. ?Source your happiness?from your life and bring it into your relationships. ? Easier said than done, but it is one of the key secrets. ?The people who ?parasite? all the happiness of their life from their relationship find that the well runs dry?very quickly. ?Whereas the people who love their lives and bring that energy to their relationship make the relationship better and better, stronger and stronger.

Hope it helps,

eric charles

P.S. Got a burning dating or relationship question? Click here and get your question answered NOW.

Source: http://www.anewmode.com/dating-relationships/guys-men-commitmentphobes/

Melissa Nelson sound of music foot locker champs champs calvin johnson calvin johnson

Sunday, January 20, 2013

Insurgents hit police facility in Afghan capital

KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) ? Taliban insurgents wearing suicide vests attacked the Kabul traffic police headquarters before dawn Monday, police said, and eyewitnesses heard numerous explosions and a still-raging gun battle two hours later.

Police officer Mirza Mohammad said at least one insurgent blew himself up at the entrance to the compound and a number of others wearing suicide vests entered the building. Another police officer said at least three attackers entered the building and two were killed, possibly by detonating their vests. The officer, who could not be named because he was not authorized to speak to the media, said a gun battle was taking place inside the three-story building.

"There are still there are two or three suicide bombers inside the traffic department compound. They are still fighting," said Mohammad Zahir, the chief of the Kabul police investigation unit. He did not provide any information on casualties. Explosions could be heard inside the building.

Taliban spokesman Zabiullah Mujahid claimed responsibility for the attack in a text message to The Associated Press.

Gul Rahman, who owns a nearby shop, said he heard at least two explosions when the attack started just before dawn. An Associated Press reporter at the scene said a number of big explosions were heard in and around the building along with heavy gunfire.

Traffic police headquarters is located on square leading to the Afghan parliament and is next to the Kabul zoo. It is also next to the Afghan border police headquarters. The facility, usually teeming with civilians seeking to get drivers licenses and registrations for vehicles, was nearly empty at the time of the attack.

It was the second insurgent attack inside Kabul in less than a week.

Last Wednesday, six Taliban suicide bombers attacked the gates of the Afghan intelligence agency in downtown Kabul, killing one guard and wounding dozens. Security forces killed all the attackers. The insurgents carried out the attack by driving a minivan loaded with explosives into a gate of the intelligence agency compound in the capital at noon. The other five attackers wearing suicide vests were in a second minivan that was also loaded with explosives. They were shot and killed and security forces later defused the bomb in their minivan.

The attacks highlighted ongoing violence in Afghanistan and the determination of the insurgency to continue fighting even as President Hamid Karzai and the U.S. negotiate for a quicker pullout of American forces.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/insurgents-hit-police-facility-afghan-capital-030649831.html

chipotle lsu football lsu football Jessie Andrews bloomberg bloomberg Daily Caller